Wells v. Manitoba (Human Rights Commission) et al., 2025 MBKB 86
[29] After considering all the evidence in relation to the Complaint, the Investigator concluded that the Board offered reasonable accommodation:
… the evidentiary record suggests that the school provided him with extensive supports, adaptations and programming based on the medical documentation it received, and its own observations of [her] son. The evidence shows that the school often already had supports in place that met or addressed some recommendations in new reports it received. While it may not have been able to implement every individual recommendation immediately or at all time, the school made a concerted effort to update and follow the son’s educational plan as per the extensive and changing recommendation made by numerous different clinicians and healthcare professionals through the son’s schooling. The school must be given some discretion with respect to the specific programming and supports it provided to its students based on medical documentation and ongoing assessments. As subject matter experts in delivering education, it appears that the school would be in the best position to determine how to provide academic accommodation to students in accordance with its assessments and available medical documentations.
This case was dismissed. I recommend you read the case in full.